留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

高功率高光束质量短脉冲/超短脉冲固体绿光激光技术研究进展

周天琛 李科学 陈毅 张新 于晶华 张逸文 孙俊杰 陈飞 王晓华 魏志鹏

周天琛, 李科学, 陈毅, 张新, 于晶华, 张逸文, 孙俊杰, 陈飞, 王晓华, 魏志鹏. 高功率高光束质量短脉冲/超短脉冲固体绿光激光技术研究进展[J]. 中国光学(中英文). doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0050
引用本文: 周天琛, 李科学, 陈毅, 张新, 于晶华, 张逸文, 孙俊杰, 陈飞, 王晓华, 魏志鹏. 高功率高光束质量短脉冲/超短脉冲固体绿光激光技术研究进展[J]. 中国光学(中英文). doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0050
ZHOU Tian-chen, LI Ke-xue, CHEN Yi, ZHANG Xin, YU Jing-hua, ZHANG Yi-wen, SUN Jun-jie, CHEN Fei, WANG Xiao-hua, WEI Zhi-peng. Research progress on high-power, high-beam-quality short-pulse/ultrashort-pulse solid-state green laser technology[J]. Chinese Optics. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0050
Citation: ZHOU Tian-chen, LI Ke-xue, CHEN Yi, ZHANG Xin, YU Jing-hua, ZHANG Yi-wen, SUN Jun-jie, CHEN Fei, WANG Xiao-hua, WEI Zhi-peng. Research progress on high-power, high-beam-quality short-pulse/ultrashort-pulse solid-state green laser technology[J]. Chinese Optics. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0050

高功率高光束质量短脉冲/超短脉冲固体绿光激光技术研究进展

cstr: 32171.14.CO.2025-0050
基金项目: 中文基金
详细信息
    作者简介:

    周天琛(1993—),男,河北省黄骅人,长春理工大学博士研究生,主要从事二次谐波、固体激光器方面的研究。E-mail:zhoutianchen@yeah.net

    陈 飞(1982—),男,河南南阳人,博士,研究员,2011年于哈尔滨工业大学获博士学位。主要从事新型激光技术及应用研究。E-mail:feichenny@126.com

    王晓华(1967—),女,黑龙江绥化人,博士,研究员,博士生导师,2003年于中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所获博士学位。主要从事半导体激光材料生长、物性研究。E-mail:biewang2001@126.com

    魏志鹏(1978—),男,吉林长春人,博士,教授,博士生导师,2008年于中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所获博士学位。主要从事半导体光电子器件方面的研究。E-mail:weizp@cust.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TP394.1;TH691.9

Research progress on high-power, high-beam-quality short-pulse/ultrashort-pulse solid-state green laser technology

Funds: National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2023YFB4604400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62434001, 62027820), the Science and Technology Development Project of Jilin Province (No. SKL202402019), the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20230101352JC), the “111” Project of China (No. D17017).
More Information
  • 摘要:

    高功率高光束质量短脉冲/超短脉冲绿光激光器在工业、医疗、科研等领域应用广泛。为了明晰基于二次谐波产生(倍频)的绿光光源的研究进展,本文系统综述了千赫兹重复频率下二次谐波产生绿光光源的最新进展,按脉宽和倍频形式分为纳秒腔内倍频、纳秒腔外倍频、皮秒腔外倍频及飞秒腔外倍频四大类别。纳秒腔内倍频KTP、LBO等晶体,功率升至51.1 W(能量50 mJ,重频1 kHz),效率50%。纳秒腔外以LBO为主,采用两倍频晶体串联可将倍频功率提升至1.04 kW(能量1.04 J,效率89%)。皮秒腔外倍频平均功率功率最高可达1460 W(能量259 mJ,效率71%)。飞秒倍频通过采用薄晶体,功率提升至29 W(能量440 μJ,效率>52%)。基于二次谐波产生的绿光光源以及相关的应用技术进步,将不断拓展其在科研、工业、医疗等领域的应用边界。

     

  • 图 1  (a)折叠(V型)腔内倍频[17];(b)直线腔内倍频[9];(c)单通腔外倍频[12];(d)双通腔外倍频[12];(e)外谐振腔倍频[12]

    Figure 1.  (a) Folded (V-shaped) intracavity frequency doubling [17]; (b) Linear intracavity frequency doubling [9]; (c) Single-pass extracavity frequency doubling [12]; (d) Double-pass extracavity frequency doubling [12]; (e) External resonant cavity frequency doubling [12].

    图 2  纳秒级腔内倍频输出平均功率、效率统计

    Figure 2.  Statistics on average output power and efficiency of nanosecond-level intracavity frequency doubling

    图 3  纳秒级腔内倍频脉宽、重复频率、单脉冲能量统计

    Figure 3.  Statistics on pulse width, repetition rate, and single-pulse energy of nanosecond-level intracavity frequency doubling

    图 4  纳秒级腔外倍频输出平均功率、效率统计

    Figure 4.  Statistics on average output power and efficiency of nanosecond-level extracavity frequency doubling

    图 5  纳秒级腔外倍频脉宽、重复频率、单脉冲能量统计

    Figure 5.  Statistics on pulse width, repetition rate, and single-pulse energy of nanosecond-level extracavity frequency doubling

    图 6  皮秒倍频输出平均功率、效率统计

    Figure 6.  Statistics on average output power and efficiency of picosecond frequency doubling

    图 7  皮秒倍频脉宽、重复频率、单脉冲能量统计

    Figure 7.  Statistics on pulse width, repetition rate, and single-pulse energy of picosecond frequency doubling

    图 8  飞秒倍频输出平均功率、效率统计

    Figure 8.  Statistics on average output power and efficiency of femtosecond frequency doubling

    图 9  飞秒倍频脉宽、重复频率、单脉冲能量统计

    Figure 9.  Statistics on pulse width, repetition rate, and single-pulse energy of femtosecond frequency doubling

    表  1  纳秒级腔内倍频研究进展(按倍频输出平均功率降序)

    Table  1.   Advances in Nanosecond Intracavity Frequency Doubling Research (Sorted in Descending Order of Frequency Doubling Output Average Power)

    年份 非线性
    晶体
    晶体
    尺寸
    (mm3)
    晶体
    工作
    温度
    倍频
    平均
    功率(W)
    倍频
    波长
    (nm)
    能量
    (μJ)
    倍频
    脉宽
    (ns)
    相对于
    吸收泵浦的
    光光转换
    效率(%)
    斜率
    效率
    (%)
    倍频M2 重频
    (kHz)
    基频
    波长
    (nm)
    基频光
    脉宽
    (ns)
    2022[20] LBO - 150 °C 0.27 532 270 50 50 - - 1 1064 -
    2017[16] PPLN 1*1*1.2 25 °C 0.323 532.7 4.84 320 5.2 6.9 - 66.7 1064 -
    2020[18] BBO 4*4*8 20 °C 0.8 539.9 80 33.9 13.40 - - 10 1080 -
    2020[19] LBO 3*3*10 29 °C 0.85 532 69 - 12 - - 12.41 1064 35
    2015[14] GTR-KTP 3*3*7 室温 1.2 532 162 12.15 17 - <1.5 75 1064 -
    2016[15] LBO 2*2*15 20 2.6 535 86.7 36.6 26.8 - - 26.8 1070 -
    2023[9] KTP 4*4*10 20 3.8 532 380 192 45.504 - 1.6/1.73 10 1064 -
    2020[17] BBO 4*4*8 20 °C 4.37 532 72.83 36 22.40 - - 60 1064 -
    2024[21] LBO - - 51.1 527 50 mJ 98.7 11.45 - 18.1/14.593 1 1054
    1. 基频光重频;2. 泵浦功率7 W时测得; 3. 为$ \text{M}_{\text{x}}^{2}/\text{M}_{\text{y}}^{2} $简写;4.效率为倍频转换效率;5.泵浦功率5.8 W时测得;
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  纳秒级腔外倍频研究进展(按倍频输出平均功率升序)

    Table  2.   Advances in Nanosecond Extracavity Frequency Doubling Research (Sorted in Ascending Order of Frequency Doubling Output Average Power)

    年份 非线性
    晶体
    晶体
    尺寸
    (mm3)
    晶体
    工作
    温度
    倍频
    平均
    功率(W)
    倍频
    输出
    波长(nm)
    能量 倍频
    脉宽
    (ns)
    光光
    转换
    效率(%)
    斜率
    效率
    (%)
    倍频
    M2
    重频
    (kHz)
    基频
    波长
    (nm)
    基频光
    脉宽
    (ns)
    2018[23] PPKTP - - 0.45 532 450 mJ 2.2 ns - - - 1 Hz 1064 -
    2023[9] KTP 4*4*10 20 °C1 1.7 532 0.34 mJ 192 ns2 <24 - - 5 1064
    2022[28] LBO 6*6*35 33.5 °C 26.4 532 13.2 mJ 6.4 ns 59.7 - 1.7/1.683 2 1064 -
    2020[29] LBO 4*4*20 23 °C 32.7 532 16.4 mJ 6.5 ns 42.3 - 1.52/1.53 2 1064 -
    2021[12] LBO 长40 - 50 515 0.5 mJ 5 ns - 68 <1.2 100-500 1030 -
    2019[22] LBO 5*5*20 - 60.2 532 0.602 mJ 3.77 ns 68.80 - 1.78 100 1064 -
    2023[27] LBO 4*4*40 145.6±
    0.05 °C
    67.4 532 33.7 mJ 41.8 ns 75.40 - 1.31 2 1064 -
    2023[26] LBO 长40 158.85 °C 70 528 0.78 mJ 65 - - 9004 1056 12 ns
    2021[25] LBO - 142.85 °C 807 535 - - 36 - 1.28 400 1070 13 ns
    2021[25] LBO - 142.85 °C 807 528 - - 60 - 1.28 400 1056 13 ns
    2020[24] LBO 10*10*10 - 580 515 0.58J 2 ns5 89 - - 1 1030 -
    2020[24] LBO 10*10*13 - 940 515 0.94J6 2 ns 78 - 1.4/1.323 1 1030 -
    2020[24] LBO 10*10*13 - 1040 515 1.04J6 2 ns - - - 1 1030 -
    1. 水冷铜炉温度为20 °C;2. 腔内倍频的脉宽;3. 为$ \text{M}_{\text{x}}^{2}/\text{M}_{\text{y}}^{2} $简写;4. 经由第一块晶体倍频产生;5. 基频光经时间整形至方形脉冲;6. 经由两块LBO晶体倍频输出的总能量;7. 输出的528 nm和535 nm混合光的平均功率;8. 输出的528 nm和535 nm混合光的光束质量;
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  皮秒级脉宽倍频研究进展(按倍频输出平均功率升序)

    Table  3.   Advances in Picosecond Pulse Width Frequency Doubling Research (Sorted in Ascending Order of Frequency Doubling Output Average Power)

    年份 非线性
    晶体
    晶体
    尺寸
    (mm3)
    晶体
    工作
    温度
    平均
    功率
    (W)
    输出
    波长
    (nm)
    能量 脉宽
    (ps)
    光光
    转换
    效率(%)
    倍频
    M2
    重频
    (kHz)
    基频
    波长
    (nm)
    基频光
    脉宽
    2021[35] LBO - 40 °C 2.2 532 2.2 mJ 27 ps >70 1.5 1 1064
    2020[36] LBO 8*8*2 - 4.38 515 4.38 mJ 1.3 ps 74 <1.6 1 1030
    2023[3] LBO 4*4*12 50 °C 5.3 532.2 0.53 mJ 18.6 ps 81.50 1.09/1.121 10 1064
    2015[37] LBO 4*4*20 24 1.96 mJ 18.9 ps 67 1.753 5 1064
    2016[38] LBO 8*8*10 47 °C 35 515 0.35 mJ - 56 1.4/1.61 100 1030 4 ps
    2019[39] LBO 9*9*20 - 40.5 532 40.5 mJ - 61.8 1.26/1.251 1 1064 600 ps
    2016[40] LBO 厚1.47 - 42 515 42 mJ - 61 - 1 1030 1.2 ps
    2020[33] LBO 6*6*15 149 °C 50 532 50 mJ - 68 3.358/2.4571 1 1064 100 ps
    2016[31] BBO 厚1.5 室温 70 515 20 mJ - 70 1.84/1.661 5 1030 1 ps
    2017[41] β-BBO 厚1.5 - 70 515 14 mJ - 70 52 1030 1 ps
    2023[34] LBO - - 259 515 259 mJ - 59 - 1 1030 1 ps
    2015[30] LBO 6*6*5 47 °C 820 515 2.7 mJ - 70 1.53/1.991 300 1030 7.7 ps
    2020[32] LBO 15*15*5 47 °C 1460 515 4.87 mJ - 71 1.38/1.431 300 1030 7.7 ps
    1. 为$ \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{x}}^{2}/\mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{y}}^{2} $简写; 2. 基频光重频;3. 最大绿光脉冲能量1.96 mJ输出时测得;
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  飞秒级脉宽倍频研究进展(按倍频输出平均功率降序)

    Table  4.   Advances in Femtosecond Pulse Width Frequency Doubling Research (Sorted in Descending Order of Frequency Doubling Output Average Power)

    年份 非线性
    晶体
    晶体
    尺寸
    (mm3)
    倍频
    平均
    功率(W)
    倍频
    输出
    波长(nm)
    能量
    (μJ)
    倍频
    脉宽
    (fs)
    光光
    转换
    效率(%)
    倍频
    M2
    重频
    (kHz)
    基频
    波长
    (nm)
    基频光
    脉宽
    (fs)
    2020[45] KBOB 7*7*1 0.235 515 235 132 fs 26.70 - 1 kHz 1030 180 fs
    2016[46] KDP 厚1 0.7 515 7 11 fs 35 - 100 kHz 1030 -
    2020[45] KBOB 7*7*1 1.03 515 103 - 17.50 - 10 kHz 1030 180 fs
    2018[47] - - 2.8 532 31 <20 fs 26.7 - 90 MHz 1063 -
    2022[43] LBO 3*3*4 5.5 530 50 - ~41 - 100 kHz 1060 280 fs
    2021[42] BBO 厚1 11.45 515 69 13 fs 40.6 - 166 kHz 1030 -
    2023[44] BBO 长1.5 29 515 440 15.7 fs >52 1.19/1.171 50.8 kHz 1030 -
    1. 为$ \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{x}}^{2} $/$ \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{y}}^{2} $简写形式
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] WU Y, WU H P, WANG Y, et al. 1.21-W 532-nm picosecond green laser generated by second-harmonic generation using K3B6O10Cl as a nonlinear optical crystal[J]. Optical Engineering, 2018, 57(6): 066112. doi: 10.1117/1.oe.57.6.066112
    [2] DING X, WANG R, ZHANG H, et al. Generation of 3.5W high efficiency blue-violet laser by intracavity frequency-doubling of an all-solid-state tunable Ti: sapphire laser[J]. Optics Express, 2008, 16(7): 4582-4587. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.004582
    [3] FAN ZH W, LIU X P, ZHANG ZH P, et al. 10 kHz repetition rate picosecond green laser for high-accuracy satellite ranging[J]. Frontiers in Physics, 2023, 10: 1115330. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.1115330
    [4] LEONE C, LOPRESTO V, DE IORIO I. Wood engraving by Q-switched diode-pumped frequency-doubled Nd: YAG green laser[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2009, 47(1): 161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.06.019
    [5] BREDILLET K, RIPORTO F, GUO T, et al. Dual second harmonic generation and up-conversion photoluminescence emission in highly-optimized LiNbO3 nanocrystals doped and co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+[J]. Nanoscale, 2024, 16(13): 6739-6747. doi: 10.1039/D4NR00431K
    [6] ZHANG A N, WANG Y P, LI ZH L, et al. Concept for power scaling by harmonic beam coaxial combination in an intra-cavity frequency doubling laser[J]. Optics Letters, 2024, 49(16): 4669-4672. doi: 10.1364/OL.531047
    [7] HUBKA Z, ANTIPENKOV R, BOGE R, et al. 120 mJ, 1 kHz, picosecond laser at 515 nm[J]. Optics Letters, 2021, 46(22): 5655-5658.
    [8] JI B, ZHENG X S, CAI Z P, et al. Compact high conversion efficiency Nd: YAG/LBO green laser using unstable V cavity[J]. Laser Physics, 2012, 22(2): 406-410. doi: 10.1134/S1054660X12020119
    [9] SHEN J P, HUANG X, XU SH C, et al. High average power green laser based on LED-side-pumped Q-switched Nd: YAG laser[J]. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2023, 35(13): 721-724. doi: 10.1109/LPT.2023.3274576
    [10] LIU Q, YAN X P, GONG M L, et al. 103W high beam quality green laser with an extra- cavity second harmonic generation[J]. Optics Express, 2008, 16(19): 14335-14340. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.014335
    [11] BAER T. Large-amplitude fluctuations due to longitudinal mode coupling in diode-pumped intracavity-doubled Nd: YAG lasers[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 1986, 3(9): 1175-1180. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.3.001175
    [12] JIANG SH B, WANG Q, JIANG L J, et al. Frequency-doubled short nanosecond fiber lasers for glass drilling and grinding[J]. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2022, 19(3): 1208-1213. doi: 10.1111/ijac.13994
    [13] KHRIPUNOV S, KOBTSEV S, RADNATAROV D. Efficiency of different methods of extra-cavity second harmonic generation of continuous wave single-frequency radiation[J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(3): 502-506. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.000502
    [14] BAI S C, DONG J. GTR-KTP enhanced stable intracavity frequency doubled Cr, Nd: YAG self-Q-switched green laser[J]. Laser Physics, 2015, 25(2): 025002. doi: 10.1088/1054-660X/25/2/025002
    [15] FU Q, ZHANG X Y, LIU ZH J, et al. An efficient frequency-doubled Nd: KLu(WO4)2 laser at 535 nm[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2016, 77: 193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.026
    [16] CHANG J H, YANG ZH B, LI H H, et al. Passively Q-switched Nd: YVO4/PPLN green laser with a few-layered MoS2 saturable absorber[J]. Optical Review, 2017, 24(6): 765-771. doi: 10.1007/s10043-017-0380-5
    [17] 孙瑛璐, 段延敏, 程梦瑶, 等. 自拉曼混频黄绿波段三波长可切换激光[J]. 物理学报, 2020, 69(12): 124201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200324

    SUN Y L, DUAN Y M, CHENG M Y, et al. Triple wavelength-switchable lasing in yellow-green based on frequency mixing of self-Raman operation[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(12): 124201. (in Chinese). doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200324
    [18] DUAN Y M, SUN Y L, ZHU H Y, et al. YVO4 cascaded Raman laser for five-visible-wavelength switchable emission[J]. Optics Letters, 2020, 45(9): 2564-2567. doi: 10.1364/OL.392566
    [19] SHILOVA G V, ZVEREV P G, SIROTKIN A A. Diode pumped Nd: YVO4/LBO/Ba(NO3)2 Raman laser at 563 nm[J]. Laser Physics Letters, 2020, 17(6): 065801. doi: 10.1088/1612-202X/ab8932
    [20] SONG M Y, CHOO H T, CHOI J H. Operational characteristics of the doubly Q-switched Nd: YAG laser and intra-cavity frequency doubled laser[J]. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 2022, 72(3): 245-251. doi: 10.3938/npsm.72.245
    [21] PANG Y J, XUE R X, LU W, et al. Intracavity frequency doubling acousto-optic Q-switched high repetition rate high-energy Nd: YLF laser[J]. Applied Optics, 2024, 63(6): 1572-1576. doi: 10.1364/AO.516321
    [22] WU ZH CH, ZHANG X L. High power 100 kHz electro-optic cavity empty green laser[J]. Optik, 2019, 178: 25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.10.051
    [23] ZHU J Q, XIE X L, SUN M ZH, et al. Analysis and construction status of SG-II 5PW laser facility[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6: e29. doi: 10.1017/hpl.2018.23
    [24] CHI H, WANG Y, DAVENPORT A, et al. Demonstration of a kilowatt average power, 1 J, green laser[J]. Optics Letters, 2020, 45(24): 6803-6806. doi: 10.1364/OL.412975
    [25] CHA Y H, KIM Y, PARK H, et al. 80-W dual-wavelength green pulsed laser based on a Yb-doped rod-type fiber amplifier[J]. Applied Physics B, 2021, 127(5): 78. doi: 10.1007/s00340-021-07628-3
    [26] CHA Y H, CHUN B, PARK H. 40-W 352-nm single-frequency nanosecond pulsed rod-type fiber laser[J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2023, 82(12): 1157-1162. doi: 10.1007/s40042-023-00780-3
    [27] LIU H Y, ZHOU Z H, BIAN Q, et al. High-efficiency nanosecond green laser based on extra-cavity second-harmonic generation of a Nd: YAG MOPA system[J]. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2023, 15(5): 1502005. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4411865
    [28] LI X D, ZHOU Y P, XU H B, et al. High-stability, high-pulse-energy MOPA laser system based on composite Nd: YAG crystal with multiple doping concentrations[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2022, 152: 108080. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108080
    [29] JIANG Y W, YANG J, LI P L, et al. High energy LiDAR source for long distance, high resolution range imaging[J]. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 2020, 62(12): 3655-3661. doi: 10.1002/mop.32650
    [30] NEGEL J P, LOESCHER A, VOSS A, et al. Ultrafast thin-disk multipass laser amplifier delivering 1.4 kW (4.7 mJ, 1030 nm) average power converted to 820 W at 515 nm and 234 W at 343 nm[J]. Optics Express, 2015, 23(16): 21064-21077. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.021064
    [31] FATTAHI H, ALISMAIL A, WANG H CH, et al. High-power, 1-ps, all-Yb: YAG thin-disk regenerative amplifier[J]. Optics Letters, 2016, 41(6): 1126-1129. doi: 10.1364/OL.41.001126
    [32] RÖCKER C, LOESCHER A, BIENERT F, et al. Ultrafast green thin-disk laser exceeding 1.4 kW of average power[J]. Optics Letters, 2020, 45(19): 5522-5525. doi: 10.1364/OL.403781
    [33] MA N, CHEN M, YANG C, et al. High-efficiency 50 W burst-mode hundred picosecond green laser[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2020, 8: e1. doi: 10.1017/hpl.2020.2
    [34] WALCH P, MAHIEU B, MORENO V, et al. Long distance laser filamentation using Yb: YAG kHz laser[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 18542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45660-9
    [35] GORBUNOV I A, KULAGIN O V. Picosecond hybrid laser based on semiconductor laser, fibre and Nd: YVO4 amplifiers. Investigation of effects limiting the peak power[J]. Quantum Electronics, 2021, 51(10): 886-893. doi: 10.1070/QEL17627
    [36] DUDA M, NOVÁK O, CHYLA M, et al. Balancing the conversion efficiency and beam quality of second harmonic generation of a two-picosecond Yb: YAG thin-disk laser[J]. Laser Physics, 2020, 30(2): 025405. doi: 10.1088/1555-6611/ab60b0
    [37] CHEN Y, LI F Q, LIU K, et al. High-efficiency 2-mJ 5-kHz picosecond green laser generation by Nd: YAG innoslab amplifier[J]. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2015, 27(14): 1531-1534. doi: 10.1109/LPT.2015.2424230
    [38] NOVÁK O, TURČIČOVÁ H, SMRŽ M, et al. Picosecond green and deep ultraviolet pulses generated by a high-power 100 kHz thin-disk laser[J]. Optics Letters, 2016, 41(22): 5210-5213. doi: 10.1364/OL.41.005210
    [39] HUANG Y T, ZHANG H B, YAN X CH, et al. A high peak power and high beam quality sub-nanosecond Nd: YVO4 laser system at 1 kHz repetition rate without SRS process[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(23): 5247. doi: 10.3390/app9235247
    [40] NOVÁK J, GREEN J T, METZGER T, et al. Thin disk amplifier-based 40 mJ, 1 kHz, picosecond laser at 515 nm[J]. Optics Express, 2016, 24(6): 5728-5733. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.005728
    [41] ALISMAIL A, WANG H CH, BRONS J, et al. 20 mJ, 1 ps Yb: YAG thin-disk regenerative amplifier[J]. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2017(125): 55717. doi: 10.3791/55717-v
    [42] DESCAMPS D, GUICHARD F, PETIT S, et al. High-power sub-15 fs nonlinear pulse compression at 515 nm of an ultrafast Yb-doped fiber amplifier[J]. Optics Letters, 2021, 46(8): 1804-1807. doi: 10.1364/OL.419683
    [43] XIE G H, LIU Y, ZHANG C C, et al. Temporal envelope programmable burst-mode Ytterbium all-fiber amplifier based, ultraviolet source at 260 nm[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2022, 151: 108032. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108032
    [44] KARST M, PFALLER P, KLAS R, et al. 22-W average power high pulse energy multipass-cell-based post-compression in the green spectral range[J]. Optics Letters, 2023, 48(5): 1300-1303. doi: 10.1364/OL.482600
    [45] ZHANG L, LONG Y, ZHANG M, et al. Femtosecond green and ultraviolet lasers generated using second-harmonic generation based on K3B6O10Br nonlinear optical crystals[J]. Optical Engineering, 2020, 59(5): 056107. doi: 10.1117/1.oe.59.5.056107
    [46] DIDENKO N V, KONYASHCHENKO A V, KOSTRYUKOV P V, et al. Temporal compression of pulses from a 100-KHz-repetiton-rate femtosecond ytterbium laser[J]. Quantum Electronics, 2016, 46(8): 675-678. doi: 10.1070/qel16147
    [47] TAWFIEQ M, HANSEN A K, JENSEN O B, et al. Intensity noise transfer through a diode-pumped titanium sapphire laser system[J]. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2018, 54(1): 1700209.
    [48] KUMAR S C, BAUTISTA E S, EBRAHIM-ZADEH M. Stable, high-power, Yb-fiber-based, picosecond ultraviolet generation at 355 nm using BiB3O6[J]. Optics Letters, 2015, 40(3): 403-406. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.000403
    [49] 程梦尧, 王兆华, 何会军, 等. 高效率三倍频产生355 nm皮秒激光的实验研究[J]. 物理学报, 2019, 68(12): 124205. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190513

    CHENG M Y, WANG ZH H, HE H J, et al. Efficient third harmonic generation of 355 nm picosecond laser pulse[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(12): 124205. (in Chinese). doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190513
    [50] 上官爱红, 张昊苏, 曹钰, 等. 空间高功率激光二极管泵浦源阵列的相变热控系统[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2024, 32(19): 2877-2888.

    SHANGGUAN A H, ZHANG H S, CAO Y, et al. Phase change thermal control system for space high-power laser diode pumping source array[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2024, 32(19): 2877-2888. (in Chinese).
    [51] CHIOW S W, KOVACHY T, HOGAN J M, et al. Generation of 43 W of quasi-continuous 780 nm laser light via high-efficiency, single-pass frequency doubling in periodically poled lithium niobate crystals[J]. Optics Letters, 2012, 37(18): 3861-3863. doi: 10.1364/OL.37.003861
    [52] KIRIYAMA H, INOUE N, YAMAKAWA K. High energy second-harmonic generation of Nd: glass laser radiation with large aperture CsLiB6O10 crystals[J]. Optics Express, 2002, 10(19): 1028-1032. doi: 10.1364/oe.10.001028
    [53] YANG X Z, ZHANG L, CUI S Z, et al. Sodium guide star laser pulsed at Larmor frequency[J]. Optics Letters, 2017, 42(21): 4351-4354. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004351
    [54] 张益嘉, 付鑫鹏, 阮迪, 等. 固体MOPA激光器光束质量优化技术研究进展[J]. 发光学报, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1929.

    ZHANG Y J, FU X P, RUAN D, et al. Research progress of beam quality optimization technology for solid-state MOPA lasers[J]. Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1929. (in Chinese).
    [55] 王英广, 张激扬, 张强, 等. 旋变二次谐波测角误差自校正[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2024, 32(2): 184-192.

    WANG Y G, ZHANG J Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Self-correction for resolver second harmonic angle measurement error[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2024, 32(2): 184-192. (in Chinese).
    [56] 宋佳齐. 高平均功率单频824nm纳秒光学参量振荡器的研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2024.

    SONG J Q. Investigation of the high-average-power single-frequency 824 nm nanosecond optical parametric oscillator[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2024. (in Chinese).
    [57] RIEDEL R, ROTHHARDT J, BEIL K, et al. Thermal properties of borate crystals for high power optical parametric chirped-pulse amplification[J]. Optics Express, 2014, 22(15): 17607-17619. doi: 10.1364/OE.22.017607
    [58] ZHANG Y, ZHANG L C, LIU M, et al. Revealing the mechanical properties of potassium dihydrogen phosphate crystals by nanoindentation[J]. Journal of Materials Research, 2016, 31(8): 1056-1064. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2016.91
    [59] ZHANG ZH CH, WANG B, TAO G H, et al. Water dissolution ultra-precision continuous polishing of potassium dideuterium phosphate (DKDP) crystal[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2023, 12982: 129820G. doi: 10.1117/12.3021149
    [60] BEASLEY J D. Thermal conductivities of some novel nonlinear optical materials[J]. Applied Optics, 1994, 33(6): 1000-1003. doi: 10.1364/AO.33.001000
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-03-24
  • 录用日期:  2026-03-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-04-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回